By Travis Waldron, cross-posted from ThinkProgress
Sports
fans, the national media, and even National Basketball Association
insiders are wondering how everyone missed out on Jeremy Lin, the
where-did-he-come-from point guard for the New York Knicks who has set
the sports world on fire over the last two weeks. Lin, after all, was
barely recruited out of high school, undrafted out of Harvard, cut twice
by NBA teams, sent to the NBA Development League, and nearly cut again,
all before emerging to score more points in his first five starts than
any player in NBA history.
The New York Times found what seems like at least part of the answer
this week: Lin is of Taiwanese descent, and according to some coaches
the Times talked to, “recruiters, in the age of
who-does-he-remind-you-of evaluations, simply lacked a frame of reference for such an Asian-American talent.”
Racial stereotypes, taboo in virtually every other aspect of American
society, still play a huge role in sports, particularly in how the
media, analysts, and scouts evaluate talent and make comparisons.
Analysts use adjectives like “crafty” and “intelligent” to describe how
white athletes overcome their general lack of athleticism, while
marveling at the sheer athletic ability of black players who supposedly
lack the intangibles of their white peers. Whites are often touted as
the tough-nosed, blue collar players; blacks, the ones who make it look
easy.
The stereotypes then carry over to the comparisons we make between athletes. Analysts spent years looking for the “next Larry Bird,”
putting the label on virtually every talented white player to reach the
NBA. On a statistical level, though, the “next Larry Bird” was actually
Kevin Garnett,
a 6-foot-11 black forward who has been in the NBA since 1995, just
three years after Bird retired. We ignore that black quarterback Donovan McNabb had a lot in common with white quarterback Mark Brunell, and that neither played much like white quarterback Dan Marino or black quarterback Warren Moon.
The same stereotypes are in play with Lin. Few other Asians have ever
played in the NBA, and the majority have been tall centers like Yao
Ming and Wang Zhizhi (Lin is 6-foot-3). The stereotype for Asian NBA
players was easy, then: they’re tall, or they don’t exist. Now that Lin
has proven that wrong, others persist. With no Asian to compare him to,
analysts are matching Lin to the next closest thing — white point guards
like Steve Nash who came out of nowhere to star in the NBA. That may be
a compliment to Lin — Nash is a two-time MVP — but other than
blossoming in similar systems and having lighter skin than most of the
other players, Lin and Nash’s games bear little resemblance.
The stereotypes, many of which exist subconsciously, likely aren’t
going anywhere. Which means whenever the next Jeremy Lin comes along,
fans, the media, and even the biggest experts won’t see him coming.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
1 comments :
Thoughtful and well-written, as always, LC. I wonder how the stereo-type analysis might shake out in the blogosphere: thoughtful and well-written=progressive/liberal while ham-handed and divisive=reactionary/conservative? Who knows... all I can say is that if talent scouts and media had a somewhat less xenophobic world view, they might have seen a guy like Lin coming if they'd only bothered to look at Taiwan, where basketball has been a national passion for at least thirty years. My guess is that Lin was at least as overlooked for having come out of Harvard as he was for being from Taiwan, but it's clear, in the wake of ESPN's personnel moves over the past few days, racial stereotyping is alive and (not so ) well in sports journalism.
Post a Comment