The
Reverend Al Sharpton and various labor unions have announced a March for Jobs. But I’m afraid we’ll need more than marches to get jobs back.
Since the start of the Great Recession at the end of 2007, America’s
potential labor force – that is, working-age people who want jobs - has
grown by over 7 million. But since then, the number of Americans who
actually have jobs has shrunk by more than 300,000.
In other words, we’re in a deep hole and the hole is deepening. In August, the
United States created no jobs at all. Zero.
America’s ongoing jobs depression - which is what it deserves to be
called - is the worst economic calamity to hit this nation since the
Great Depression. It’s also terrible news for President Obama, whose
chances for re-election now depend almost entirely on the Republican
party putting up someone so vacuous and extremist that the nation
rallies to Obama regardless.
The problem is on the demand side. Consumers (whose spending is 70%
of the economy) can’t boost the American economy on their own. They’re
still too burdened by debt, especially on homes that are worth less than
their mortgages. In addition, their jobs are disappearing, their pay is
dropping, their medical bills are soaring.
Consumer spending slowed again in August as incomes dropped.
Businesses, for their part, won’t hire without more sales. So we’re in a vicious cycle. The question is what to do about it.
When consumers and businesses can’t boost the economy on their own,
the responsibility must fall to the purchaser of last resort. As John
Maynard Keynes informed us 75 years ago, that purchaser is the
government.
Government can hire people directly to maintain the nation’s parks
and playgrounds and to help in schools and hospitals. It can funnel
money to help cash-starved states and local government so they don’t
have to continue to slash payrolls and public services. And it can hire
indirectly - contracting with companies to build schools, revamp public
transportation and rebuild the nation’s crumbling highways, bridges and
ports.
Not only does this create jobs but also puts money in the hands of
all the people who get the jobs, so they can turn around and buy the
goods and services they need - generating more jobs. Not exactly rocket
science.
But congressional Republicans are firmly opposed. Why don’t
Republicans get it? Either they’re knaves - they want the economy to
stay awful through next election day so Obama gets the boot. Or they’re
fools - they’ve bought the lie that reducing the deficit now creates
more jobs.
Republicans claim businesses aren’t hiring because they’re uncertain
about regulatory costs, or their taxes are too high, or they can’t find
the skilled workers they need. But if these were the reasons businesses
weren’t hiring - and consumer demand were growing - we’d expect
companies to make more use of their current employees. The average
number of hours worked per week by the typical employee would be
increasing.
In fact, the length of the average workweek has been dropping. In
August, it declined for the third month in a row, to 34.2 hours. That’s
back to where it was at the start of the year - barely longer than what
it was at its shortest point two years ago (33.7 hours in June 2009).
Republicans say America can’t afford to spend more. In truth, we’ll
be in worse shape if we don’t. If the economy remains dead in the water,
the ratio of public debt to the total economy balloons.
Besides, the United States can now borrow money from the rest of the
world at fire-sale rates.
Interest on the ten-year Treasury bill is now
under 2%. That’s an almost unprecedented deal. With so many Americans
unemployed and so much of our infrastructure in disrepair, this is the
ideal time to get on with the work of rebuilding the nation.
But it won’t be enough for government to become the buyer of last
resort – in Keynes’s words, to prime the pump. If the economy is to
continue to grow and create jobs after the government has stopped the
priming, there must be enough water in the well. Yet, now and in the
foreseeable future, America’s vast middle class doesn’t have the
purchasing power to keep the mechanism going.
For more than 30 years, the
median wage in America has barely increased, adjusted for inflation – even though the economy is twice as large as it was three decades ago.
Almost all the gains have gone to the top - especially the top 1%, who now receive over 20% of total income (it was just 10% in 1980).
As long as America’s vast middle class could continue to borrow on
the rising value of their homes, they continued to spend - thereby
keeping the economy going. But going deeper into debt is not a
sustainable strategy. Now, after the bubble burst, America’s middle
class doesn’t have enough money to maintain the economy at or near full
employment.
Any long-term strategy for rescuing the American economy must
therefore seek to reverse the widening gap in income and wealth. One
place to start is tax reform. The
earned income tax credit
- a wage subsidy for lower-income workers - should be enlarged and
expanded. Taxes on the middle class should be reduced - including social
security payroll taxes (80% of Americans pay more in payroll taxes than
they do in income taxes).
Taxes on the wealthy, on the other hand, should be increased. The
president has proposed closing some tax loopholes that allow the super-rich to reduce their tax liability,
and to end the tax cut on the rich put in place by George W Bush in
2001 (thereby increasing the top marginal tax rate to what it was under
Bill Clinton - 39%).
But the nation should go much further, particularly in light of the
large budget deficit projected several years from now. We need more tax
brackets at the top, with higher marginal rates. The capital-gains tax
(now at 15%) should be raised to match the income tax rate. And a wealth
surtax of 2% should be applied to all wealth in excess of $7 million.
Needless to say, Republicans won’t go along with anything like this. They balk even at the president’s modest plan.
It would be better for President Obama to assume that he will get no
Republican support this year and next, and build his 2012 election
campaign around a bold plan to revive jobs and the American middle class
— and end the American Jobs Depression.
0 comments :
Post a Comment